Investment properties
Section 16 of FRS 102 sets out the accounting treatment for investments in land or buildings provided that they meet the definition of investment property. The treatment extends to property interests held by a lessee under an operating lease that are treated like investment property.
What is an investment property?
Investment property is property (land or a building, or part of a building, or both) held by the owner or by the lessee under a finance lease to earn rentals or for capital appreciation or both.
The following are not to be regarded as investment properties:
- Those held for use in the production or supply of goods or services or for administrative purposes;
- Those that are for sale in the ordinary course of business;
- Mixed use property where the fair value of the investment property element cannot be determined reliably;
- Those held primarily for the provision of social benefits.
The definition of an investment property in FRS 102 is wider than that currently used in SSAP 19 as it does not exclude from the definition properties which are owner occupied or let to another group company. Note that International Accounting Standards explicitly exclude from the definition properties let out to another entity under a finance lease.
[[[The definition of an investment property in FRS 102 is wider than that currently used in SSAP 19 as it does not exclude from the definition properties which are owner occupied or let to another group company]]]
Where an entity has mixed use properties, these should be separated between investment property and property, plant and equipment. If the investment component of the mixed used property cannot be measured reliably without undue cost or effort, then the whole property should be accounted for as property, plant and equipment.
Where an entity has properties which are held primarily for the provision of social benefits, such as social housing these should be property, plant and equipment. There is no separate reference to such properties under current UK GAAP and under International Accounting Standards.
Where an entity has a property interest that is held by a lessee under an operating lease it may be classified and accounted for as investment property if the property would otherwise meet the definition of an investment property and the lessee can measure the fair value of the property interest without undue cost or effort on an on-going basis. This classification alternative is available on a property-by-property basis.
How is investment property initially measured?
Investment property should initially be measured at cost. The cost of a purchased investment property consists of:
- its purchase price;
- any directly attributable expenditure such as legal fees;
- property transfer taxes; and
- other transaction costs.
Where payment is deferred beyond normal credit terms, the cost should be the present value of all future payments.
Where an entity constructs an investment property itself it should determine the cost by following the relevant paragraphs in Section 17 – Property, Plant and Equipment.
The initial cost of an interest in property which is held under a lease and classified as an investment property should be determined by following the relevant paragraphs in Section 20 – Leases. This applies even if the lease would otherwise be classified as an operating lease if it was within the scope of Section 20.
How is an investment property subsequently measured?
Where the fair value of investment properties can be “measured reliably without undue cost or effort” on an on-going basis then the property should be held at fair value as set out in Section 16. The movement on fair value is accounted through profit or loss. No depreciation is charged.
Where there is undue cost or effort and the fair value cannot be measured reliably, investment property should be accounted for using the cost model in Section 17 – Property, Plant and Equipment. Any such investment properties should remain within the scope of Section 17 unless a reliable measure of fair value becomes available and that it is envisaged that a fair value will be measurable on an on-going basis.
[[[Where there is undue cost or effort and the fair value cannot be measured reliably, investment property should be accounted for using the cost model]]]
If a leasehold interest in property is classified as investment property, it is the interest which should be accounted for at fair value and not the underlying property. Guidance on obtaining a fair value in this case is set out in Section 11 – Basic Financial Instruments.
How is this different to ‘old GAAP’?
Currently under SSAP 19 changes investment properties are re-valued each year at their open market value. It would appear that the use of fair value under FRS 102 provides the possibility of using the existing use value rather than market value.
Also under SSAP 19, any changes in open market value are recognised in the Statement of Recognised Gains and Losses (STRGL), unless a reduction in value, or its reversal, is expected to be permanent which leads to the movement being charged or credited to the profit and loss account.
There is no ‘undue cost or effort’ opt-out under SSAP 19. Therefore investment properties should always be subsequently measured at open market value. No depreciation is charged under SSAP 19 unless the property is held under a finance lease where it must be depreciated once the remaining lease term is below 20 years.
What if fair value becomes difficult to obtain?
For investment properties which have previously been measured at fair value, it is possible that an entity is subsequently unable to determine a reliable measure of fair value without undue cost or effort. Where this is the case, an investment property is reclassified as property, plant and equipment (PPE) in accordance with Section 17. This will continue to apply in subsequent years until a reliable measure of fair value does become available.
Where investment properties are accounted for under Section 17, the carrying amount of the investment property on the date when the fair value is not available becomes its cost for the purposes of Section 17.
Disclosure of this change is required. However it should be noted that this is a change of circumstances and not a change in accounting policy.
Reclassification is also required where the use of the property changes such that it no longer meets the definition of an investment property.
What about deferred tax?
Deferred tax is chargeable on timing differences that arise from fair value gains on investment properties. Deferred tax is measured using the tax rates and allowances that apply to sale of the asset, except for investment property that has a limited useful life and is held within a business model whose objective is to consume substantially all of the economic benefits embodied in the property over time.
[[[Deferred tax is chargeable on timing differences that arise from fair value gains on investment properties.]]]
Are there any exemptions on transition?
There are no exemptions in general for investment properties on transition. So the changes in FRS 102 will apply to most investment properties. Those which are treated in a similar way to PPE (see the previous question above) can benefit from a ‘deemed cost’ exemption which we’ll cover more fully in the section on PPE.